Providing clarity on charges

I need to consider that network sandbox may be enabled, and when in doubt, I should ask the user. I want to keep it concise while providing a brief summary of charges like E20.1/E20.2, which relate to player and official conduct. Without a specific date, I won’t fabricate details but will respond with a clarifying question. I might ask what specific info the user wants, like examples of possible penalties and typical procedures. I'll also check if I can use the network.Summarizing the FA charges

I see that the Codex CLI has approval for on-failure, and since the network may be enabled, I could ask if the user wants me to check live sources. I need to explain the collective misconduct charges by the FA after match conflicts, usually based on FA Rules E20/E21, where clubs must ensure orderly conduct. Common consequences include fines, warnings, and possible match bans. I'll also clarify the process for responding to charges and ask which team the user supports and what specific info they want.

这是一条足总纪律通告类新闻：因赛后发生冲突，南安普顿与考文垂被英足总指控。通常属于“未能确保球员/工作人员行为得体”的集体不当行为指控（常见依据为FA Rule E20系条款）。

你想了解哪部分？

• 事件细节：发生在哪场比赛、时间线、裁判与第四官员报告要点
• 具体指控条款与流程：认/不认指控的截止日、听证流程
• 潜在处罚：通常为俱乐部罚款；若个人被追加指控，可能有禁赛/罚款；极少数累犯情形会加重
• 俱乐部回应与后续进展

需要的话我可以帮你查英足总官方通告与权威媒体的细节并做个要点摘要。你更关心哪一块？